Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The ultimate reality


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 03:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

The ultimate reality

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBOOK. This article is part of a COI effort to promote Kumar and his books. I have not been able to find any additional WP:RS to establish notability. shoy (reactions) 12:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This is just an advertisement for a non-notable book, written in a POV style. Tigercompanion25 (talk) 17:44, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find anything to show that this press book is ultimately notable. Leadstart also looks to be a vanity press per things like this and this. I'm going to try my hand at drafting a speedy deletion criteria for books again. I think that we might be able to get one if we just limited it to self-published work. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete – Article does not assert notability, and I could not find any reliable sources. The article itself reads like an advertisement, or something I'd find on the back cover. Sunmist3 (talk) 09:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing but promotion. Fails WP:NBOOK Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOTPROMOTION, sources cited are not reliable, a gsearch brings up the same. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:13, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete honestly, by far not at all convincing, author's article is being deleted now also. SwisterTwister   talk  06:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.