Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The vacant lots


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted by Uncle G, "Foundational copyright violation. Copied directly, in toto and word for word, from the first cited source." NAC for cleanup.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 03:08, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

The vacant lots

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Band with no real references except a pitchfork note but that isn't a real reference because it's a mixtape that includes one song from the band. Shadowjams (talk) 07:58, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Pitchfork is certainly real; however this reference is just an inclusion on their mixtape and contains zero information about the band, certainly not enough to base an article off of. The bulk of this article appears to be sourced from a single source (fault magazine). riffic (talk) 13:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree. I meant to indicate that Pitchfork is a good source, but however the link provided doesn't say anything about the band... I clarified the wording a little bit to make that clearer. Shadowjams (talk) 21:54, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.