Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The valley cr3w


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:HOAX Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 06:12, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

The valley cr3w

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Unsourced article on a Channel 4 series that has apparently been on the air since 2000, but remarkably doesn't seem to have generated any evidence of existence on the Internet - no reviews, no news articles, not even any fanfic-, barring this article. Would appear to be a hoax, although possibly not quite blatant enough a hoax for a speedy deletion. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 14:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Like the nominator, I can't find any evidence this show actually exists. Unreferenced, unverifiable, probable hoax. --Muchness (talk) 15:02, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete 0 google hits.  Triplestop  x3  15:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:56, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete with haste A nicely written article... encyclopedic and quite informative. However, even Channel 4 itself cannot offer evidence of its existance... and this is quite strange considering the allegation that it is still aring after 9 years. Another interesting mis-fact, is that although a Stan Boardman exists, he is an English actor and not a producer for Channel 4... and he has no credits for anything even remotely named "The valley cr3w". Another point to muse is that the alleged series writer Anabel Fisher does not seem to exist either.  My opinion is that this article is a blatant hoax... nicely written and well formatted, but a hoax none-the-less. Considering that the author User:Jessandconor performed only this one edit ever, I find myself wondering just who the SPA actually is... and if an experienced editor is chuckling now over this very discussion. Delete. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 04:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.