Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The worst person you know


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 01:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

The worst person you know

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article was redirected after a contested Prod, which I have reverted. Bringing it up here as a better venue to consider deletion. Artw (talk) 16:48, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Artw (talk) 16:48, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Procedural nomination, i should be considered neutral leaning keep. Artw (talk) 16:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: the article has multiple independent, reliable and secondary sources with significant coverage. The sources are also published over the period of a year, so WP:NOTNEWS does not apply here. It meets the requirements from the WP:GNG. It is currently a stub article, but can be extended quite a bit from the sources that are currently used. Since the subject has stated he is fine with the publicity in The Guardian article, there should be no problems with WP:BLP to have an article about the subject. PhotographyEdits (talk) 16:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:PhotographyEdits. It does appear to meet general notability. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 17:03, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, has indepth coverage over time, e.g.: .-- Mvqr (talk) 11:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment consider this article should be about the use of the article as an internet meme, not about the guy in the picture, similarly to how "No Way to Prevent This" is written -Gouleg🛋️ harass/hound 14:25, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @Gouleg Good point, I have added this link to the see also section as well. PhotographyEdits (talk) 19:07, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge to "No Way to Prevent This", Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens. I agree that the topic meets GNG, but it's much better to present the article topic in context, and neither article is terribly long. Ovinus (talk) 22:38, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ovinus That article does not provide any broader context of this article, it is only a different article about a (series of) satirical article(s). PhotographyEdits (talk) 10:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * If any, it should be a redirect to Clickhole -Gouleg🛋️ harass/hound 15:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @Gouleg I guess, but merging it into the publisher article does not really provide any valuable context either. PhotographyEdits (talk) 07:03, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment another argument for keeping this article would be the inclusion of the picture: since it is non-free, the entire article has to be about the subject. PhotographyEdits (talk) 17:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per PhotographyEdits.4meter4 (talk) 21:17, 27 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.