Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The zero-dumb fallacy

Original research; there's no sign of this online. - Kenwarren 19:04, Aug 1, 2004 (UTC)
 * The writing may have disproved the theory. Delete. Ilyanep (Talk) 19:13, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. Elf-friend 19:28, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * It's those monkeys and their typewriters, I'm telling you. Delete. --Ianb 20:35, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Yup. While those monkeys might not be typing Shakespeare, they sure as shooting are cranking out the Wikipedia equivalent of the Weekly World News.  Delete. - Lucky 6.9 01:04, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: This is a private rant by someone who can't even coin his rant's title properly. It's a dumb rant, in other words, from someone I assume who feels that too much is being asked of him. Geogre 01:24, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * A zero-content fallacy. Delete. - DavidWBrooks 13:54, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Google shows no uses of this concept. Delete.  Gwimpey 05:43, Aug 3, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. DJ Clayworth 18:01, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Someone's private joke. LeeHunter 00:23, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)