Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thea Glindorf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Deleted, but Userified as User:TheActressUK/Thea Glindorf. If no references are found within a year, that p. probably should be deleted also.  DGG ( talk ) 04:01, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Thea Glindorf

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet criteria of WP:ENT. I cannot find significant coverage in reliable sources. Google search for results in 83 "unique" pages: a lot of social networking and directories, but none of them covering her in any depth as an actor. Contested prod. ... disco spinster   talk  03:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Right, again, I'm new, so I might be going at this discussion all wrong - if I am, I apologize. Thea Glindorf is a theatre actress and as such there won't be a lot of internet coverage of her as an actress, because that is generally not used for theatre actresses/actors, except on their own webpages - which is currently down (as I stated; I talked to her about). I'm really not trying to step on anyone's toes, I just saw this girl perform about a month and a half ago in Birmingham and found out that there wasn't a lot about her on the internet, so I contacted her and asked her if I could make a wikipedia page about her and she said that was alright. I completely understand why you don't want to add any number of odd pages, but this girl is good, and while she is not famous (yet), I just wanted to make her more visible.

Now if that is completely against Wikipedia rules, I do apologize. But I did not see that anywhere on the site.

And the reason for me removing the deletions box, was because I went to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion and as far as I understood point 2, I was allowed to do that.

Again; if that is completely 'against Wikipedia rules' I apologise - I thought I was acting accordingly.

Hope you will get back to me, as I am still utterly confused about the grounds for deletion.


 * Reply (and Delete!vote) You've provided the reason for deletion yourself - "...she is not famous (yet), I just wanted to make her more visible...". Wikipedia is not a crystal ball or a promotional tool. Until Ms Glindorf is the subject of multiple, independent, reliable sources (or otherwise meets the criteria at WP:NACTOR), she should not have an article on Wikipedia. Yunshui (talk) 07:10, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Okay. Well.. is it possible to save the page and re-upload it when she has more stuff written about her? I read somewhere that it could be moved to a "safe place" where I could keep editing it, without it being deleted.. If that is possible, I'd love to get help to move it there, please. TheActressUK (talk) 12:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Userify per creator's request. (See WP:Userification.) Clarityfiend (talk) 01:10, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.