Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theatre Dependere


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 00:13, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Theatre Dependere

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable theater company. References refer to local coverage only. Listed awards cannot be verified (I was unable to find any references to the cited festivals) and may amount to nothing more than local theatrical competitions. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I am also listing the following articles as they relate to the founder of this group, and a theatrical production written by the founder and produced by the group:

- WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:22, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * These articles have only good intentions, not just dissemination of local labor, but for everyone. There are thousands of big and small articles on wikipedia, maybe that one article is not remarkable, but there are others worse than these articles.


 * We can work together to frame in a great shape.--Itatira (talk) 14:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Most of the references center around a school's use of theater as a teaching method/tool. Looking at WP:CREATIVE and WP:ORG, they would not pass. If these articles were notable, I would expect some non-local coverage about their work, like reviews, but I don't see it. All references for the play are about the bible verse, not the play. I don't see any notability asserted in the play's article either. Clubmarx (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete does not appear to pass WP:ORG, no evidence this is any different or more notable than any of countless other similar local groups. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete No significant coverage by third-part sources.Lechatjaune (talk) 20:25, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.