Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thecomputernerd01


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR.) Regarding the potential for a merge, a merge discussion can continue on a talk page. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 01:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Thecomputernerd01

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable person. The only reliable source included in the article is. After searching through the web, I can't find anything else that would demonstrate the significant coverage required for notability. It appears to be your average semi-popular YouTuber. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete possible A7, also fails WP:BIO. ///Euro Car  GT  02:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  03:12, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  03:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: I've removed the YT source and the iTunes source, as neither can show notability and their inclusion isn't absolutely necessary for the article. Chomik's music being on iTunes doesn't really do anything to show his notability- we have a lot of people who fail notability guidelines that have their music for sale on iTunes or somewhere else. I've also removed this source since the review wasn't actually a review, as it was actually a brief comment by a teenager that they interviewed for a piece. Now the one thing Chomik has in his favor somewhat is that what sources do remain are from a relatively wide span of time and locations, so if we can find 2-3 more sources we could merit a weak keep. This could probably be merged to List of YouTube personalities, possibly, but I'm starting to get leery of including everyone since it's starting to become a little unwieldy. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:44, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Merging seems like a good idea, may change my !vote to Merge. An issue is Google isn't a label company :D -- ///Euro Car GT  16:28, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Monty  845  20:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 11:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep A credible claim of notability with sufficient sourcing to scrape by the notability standard. Alansohn (talk) 14:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The notability standard is "significant coverage in reliable sources". I do not consider 3 or 4 articles in the last 5 years as "significant coverage". We need significant coverage so that we can write a verifiable article bigger than a stub. Here there is no such coverage. I would have no objections merging the content we have to the list mentioned above. Mz7 (talk) (formerly Michaelzeng7) 04:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.