Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thecoolestthingever


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. J I P | Talk 07:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Thecoolestthingever
Web forum, no evidence of passing WP:WEB, looks very much like vanispamcruftisement Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 13:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

There have been a total of 7568 posts in less than a month by 67 registered users. It is not a 'vanispamcruftisement' whatever you consider that to be.
 * Delete, 67 users do not a notable forum make. - Randwicked Alex B 14:03, 18 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep or at least give them a chance to tidy up the entry to wikipedia standards. and perhaps a little bit chilling out might not go amiss, hmm? Bristle-krs 15:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep until we have time to sort out our entry. The number of registered users is subjective anyway. Soreenkid 15:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Congratulations on a reasonably sucessful forum, but still not encylopedic. When they get those 25,000 registered users five years from now, though, then we'll vote keep. - squibix
 * Delete per failing WP:WEB miserably. Cyde Weys 2M-VOTE  16:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --NaconKantari 21:22, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete easily fails WP:WEB guideline. Vanity issues, also. Sliggy 21:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonnotable forum. Pretty soon everyone will want an article for their forum. --Kerowyn 00:26, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Oh well, was worth a go. Soreenkid 15:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.