Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theistic evolution and the Roman Catholic Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete (preceding non-admin comment added by Lourdes  17:37, 8 January 2017 (UTC))...where's the snow?  Singu larity  07:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Theistic evolution and the Roman Catholic Church

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Yet another POV fork from the author that brought you Creation and the Roman Catholic Church. Like that article the material in this is already covered in Evolution and the Roman Catholic Church. ornis ( t ) 23:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It seems that contested edits in one article only spawn other articles.  This one contributes nothing.  Kablammo 23:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Per nom.  This appears to be one in a line of POV forks.  Not necessary, because information is presented elsewhere.   Orange Marlin  Talk• Contributions 23:30, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete If we allow these kinds of forks, Wikipedia will be unusable and unreadable and a mess.--Filll 23:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Smite with the jawbone of an ass. Barring that, delete. Yet another POV fork from this author. Persistent fellow, isn't he? Realkyhick 23:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete POV fork of existing article. KillerChihuahua?!? 23:52, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nen  yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 01:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. Harlowraman 03:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete This POV-forking-spree is becoming the theater of the absurd. &#0149;Jim 62 sch&#0149;  09:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The author would do better to work on reaching consensus on the main article rather than throwing up pov forks in violation of WP:POINT. ... dave souza, talk 10:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't need a article to itself Ealdgyth | Talk 16:55, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Down with POV forks! ¿SFGi Д nts!  ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 16:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.