Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theluxuryspot.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 05:59, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Theluxuryspot.com

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

contested prod, this blog lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources to demonstrate notability. References listed are either primary sources (the website itself), or the blog is not the subject of the article and mentions it only in passing. Only the Daily News article on paid bloggers is one where this blog could be considered the subject of the article. Not finding sufficient additional sources to support notability. RadioFan (talk) 12:33, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. UltraMagnusspeak 13:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete One off newspaper articles do not make notability. Delete. --Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! (talk) 13:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this website. Joe Chill (talk) 21:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.