Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theneworiginals001


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 22:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Theneworiginals001

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete as non-notable web content. Appears to be advertising and fails WP:WEB. SmileToday☺(talk to me, My edits) 02:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page as it was previously prodded:


 * Delete all crap Yourname 02:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable web content. Borderline speedy. i (soon to be Soleil) 02:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete both. If it's not even very popular on YouTube, it can't possibly have enough notability for Wikipedia.  No sources/references. Accounting4Taste 04:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 04:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, no claim of notability (indeed, they even go out of their way to point out non-notability: the article states "view count on Youtube is very low"). Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * whats the point in deleting it, its not bothering anyone —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.92.147.22 (talk) 16:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * See Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. SmileToday☺(talk to me, My edits) 17:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete no claim of notability on either article. SkierRMH 00:27, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.