Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theo Schear


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:08, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Theo Schear

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:SOAPBOX, most of the material is written by Tschear, which could be inferred to be Theo Schear. (Most images and files on the page are contributed and attributed to Tschear.) Much of the material on the page states personal and professional details of no notability. Per WP:GNG, most citations either do not mention Schear or are from personal websites/Facebook/Twitter. Per WP:FILMMAKER, credits detail either minute roles in larger productions or large roles in minute productions. – BriefEdits (talk) 21:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 21:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 21:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:10, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:10, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:10, 29 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Google turns up absolutely no independent significant coverage of him. Completely fails WP:N, even more than six years after the article was created. And, yes, it does appear to amount to the use of Wikipedia as a web host in violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST. This article really slipped through the cracks. Largoplazo (talk) 02:38, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: Oh, this is cute. From the article, "The project, titled Carpe 3Diem, contests the subjective notion of Notability included in the Wikipedia guidelines and encourages the public to take control of their digital legacy." This is footnoted to the Wikipedia notability guidelines. It's like a dare. Maybe there'll be a follow-up project with this discussion at its core. Largoplazo (talk) 12:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Notability fail. Does not pass criteria for WP:NARTIST, WP:GNG, WP:FILMMAKER. This non-encyclopedic PROMO article is likely WP:COI developed by several SPA IP accounts and as noted above in nom. Many refs are unverifiable, or are blogs or social media. Netherzone (talk) 04:39, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Netherzone, Largo, and the nom have covered the relevant points. While I believe the proposed CSD G11 is also perfectly accurate, I'd prefer we close the AFD so its unambiguous that the topic itself is non-notable, rather than the article state being the issue. -- ferret (talk) 13:48, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree. I've removed the CSD tag. Largoplazo (talk) 14:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment: Although I'm not going to vote on this one, I have to give Tschear props for the effort he's put into this article! Pretty cool photo and signature he's got there, too. Dflaw4 (talk) 15:17, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.