Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theocratic Realism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Theocratic Realism

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Short, unsourced article about a possible neologism, which makes the article a candidate for deletion per WP:NEO. Also, a Google search shows too little hits, most of them being the article itself. Victao lopes (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The concept conveyed by such a term is clearly notable in my mind, but the term itself has no notoriety, and the book that allegedly coined it is yet to be published. Give it time. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 23:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am the author of the to-be published book and I am not quite ready to have this out in the open. When it is published you may do with it as you will. Please delete this listing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Divin021 (talk • contribs) 02:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: If you want the article to be deleted, you can add the template to the very top of the article. However, considering that the article is in the middle of an afd debate, you should not do that. Wait until the debate is closed. Victao lopes (talk) 02:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I do not think that this is notable. J.d ela noy gabs adds  23:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable neologism. Majoreditor (talk) 02:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.