Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theodore "Ted" Herrick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:05, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Theodore "Ted" Herrick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking ghtis and gnews of substance. Article references are trivial in nature and do not support notability. Fails WP:BIO. red dog six (talk) 18:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:37, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:37, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Being an elector is not sufficiently notable. -- Jprg1966  (talk)  21:40, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Presidential elector isn't a claim to notability and member of the Grand Junction, Iowa City Council isn't sufficient. Semi-promotional politician fluff. Carrite (talk) 06:22, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Being a member of the Electoral College is a state or national elected office, which normally indicates notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:37, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - Members of the Electoral College are appointed not elected. The individual fails WP:NPOL. red dog six  (talk) 21:00, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Members of the Electoral College are elected (the candidates for President and Vice President are not actually on the ballot - the members of the College are - the candidates names stand for a slate of electors. However, the structure of the College is such that the members, by virtue of their position, do not routinely receive significant coverage in secondary sources. Thus, the Electors usually do not meet WP:GNG for their elected status. Delete. Enos733 (talk) 02:54, 10 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete--based on what's there now, I don't see any way it meets the Keithbob • Talk  • 02:14, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.