Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theodoric Chew


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Theodoric Chew

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article contains unnecessary puffery and promotion of the subject. The subject's notability is in question, as the majority of the sources cited lack any depth, only mention the subject in passing, or are user-generated content. Note that while Chew is employed by notable companies, notability is not inherited and press releases do not grant notability per WP:NOTE. Compounding this is the fact that (per Conflict of interest/Noticeboard) an editor was payed via Upwork to create this article. SamHolt6 (talk) 16:36, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  16:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  16:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nom. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom ,he is working in a notable company but it is not notability is not inherited and every employee in  notable company is not notable.Lacks indepth WP:SIGCOV and is promotional.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.