Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theophasic science


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was: speedily deleted as recreation of AFD-deleted article - see Articles for deletion/TheoPhasic Science. --Stormie 01:04, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

Theophasic science
This sounds like complete crackpottery to me. Besides, the article itself says it's a 'TPS is still under development as it has only been seriously acknowledged for the past several months', which makes it unsuitable for WP. Cmdrjameson 23:16, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax (I can only assume so reading it). Marskell 23:25, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete if it is the recreation of a deleted article: Articles for deletion/TheoPhasic Science (note change of capitals). WP:NOR otherwise. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 23:46, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Nonsense. -- SGBailey 23:48, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD. Edwardian 23:56, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science and medicine-related deletions.  --Edwardian 23:56, 17 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.