Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theory of Condensed Matter group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Cavendish Laboratory. There don't seem to be any independent sources, hence there is no sourced information that could be merged into the target article. (non-admin closure) Randykitty (talk) 16:49, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Theory of Condensed Matter group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't think groups in a laboratory really merit their own articles. This would I think be better served in the main article on the Cavendish. Jamesx12345 23:56, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. Only get around 100 Google hits total.  But they might get mentioned quite a lot in scientific journals.  It seems fairly popular on Google Scholar, for example. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:52, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that asserts the notability of the group, just shows it is producing work in academic journals. All university science departments have workgroups with a focus in particular disciplines, and whilst this is an especially large and prestigious one, I'm not sure it merits inclusion. It might be worth finding out if other similar groups have articles, and if so what consensus is surrounding them. Jamesx12345 11:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Cavendish Laboratory. I don't see this being a subject that on its own would meet WP:GNG.  It would seem more appropriate that any coverage be handled in the main article unless new sources arrive that specifically demonstrate the notability of this group.   Red Phoenix  build the future...remember the past... 22:57, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.