Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theory of Delayed Proclivity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Closed as moot. Title is now a redirect, and nobody seems to be arguing here for the deletion of the page to which it has been redirected. Redirects for discussion are discussed somewhere else. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Theory of Delayed Proclivity

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unverifiable, unreferenced potential neologism. Possibly WP:MADEUP. CultureDrone (talk) 22:03, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that this phenomenon has a name, but this assuredly isn't it.  Definitely WP:MADEUP.   Anturiaethwr  Talk  22:24, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Changing to keep the article (or merge, if there's an appropriate target somewhere), but delete this redirect per my response to Colonel Warden.  Anturiaethwr  Talk  12:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete-fails WP:N, WP:REF, WP:V, WP:RS, and it seems like a hoax.-- S R X  22:30, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The article describes a notable phenomenon. The article should be improved rather than deleted and I have made a start on this in accordance with our editing policy. Colonel Warden (talk) 09:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * All right... that's no longer the article it was, not even the name. My original !vote now only applies to the redirect Theory of Delayed Proclivity, which doesn't make sense as a name for this phenomenon.  I'd be quite surprised, however, if this weren't a merge candidate, say to Sense of time; of course, that's not a matter for AfD.   Anturiaethwr  Talk  12:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.