Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theory of General Relativity of Art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd (?!? - help us) 00:35, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Theory of General Relativity of Art
Under WP:NOR. The article is a new theory, which has no mentions at all on google. It is premature for an article. The author needs to gain wider acceptance first. Tyrenius 13:52, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 14:21, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with extreme prejudice. I'm inclined to cite WP:BALLS, but WP:NOR will do just fine.  RGTraynor 15:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think there's any need to add insult to injury, and we should Assume good faith.Tyrenius 17:14, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * One can assume good faith and still find a premise to be complete nonsense. RGTraynor 19:05, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as WP:NOR-- blue 520  15:21, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, definitely WP:OR. I think quoting WP:BALLS gives it way too much credit. --Deville (Talk) 00:01, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, woops, I was thinking WP:BALLS refers to "crystal balls". Sorry, WP:BALLS isn't too much credit then. --Deville (Talk) 00:03, 29 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.