Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theory of Musical Dimension


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Theory of Musical Dimension

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete. Five separate articles about musical theories theorized by a single musician, whose only discernible evidence of usage is in that musician's own work -- there's no evidence shown that any of them has ever been adopted in anybody else's work, and one of the articles in fact entirely fails to explain the theory at all, simply asserting that it exists, the end. So these things can certainly be mentioned in He Xuntian's main BLP, but none of the articles does anything to demonstrate why standalone articles would be needed about each theory separately from the main article about him. Bearcat (talk) 19:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The term "musical dimensions" is pretty common and definitely not attributed to He Xuntian. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:17, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. The theory principle has been expression clearly in References (The Compositional Concept and Theory of He Xuntian and Thus have I heard He Xuntian,etc.).Ytbr (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:29, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Those references are about He Xuntian and his work, and thus fail to demonstrate that these are independently notable as standalone concepts separate from him. Bearcat (talk) 16:08, 26 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.