Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theosophy and politics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Theosophy and politics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Original research, namely a synthesis of many cases when theosophists took part in politics or politicians were interested in theosophy. Most of the sources are either theosophic (and thus not independent, as WP:RS requires) or not consider the topic in any depth, like mentioning a membership of a person in Theological society. The only exception is "Neo-Hinduism and Theosophy" section, which is, although non-neutral and not-quite-on-topic, refers to the works by Bevir. Wikisaurus (talk) 12:02, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:04, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:04, 1 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. Лемуриец (talk) 06:38, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - the lead itself says it's not connected in any way - and the connections then follow. That's original research. Bearian (talk) 15:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.