Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theresa LaBarbera White


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete upon confirmation of zero relevant Ghits. --F a ng Aili 說嗎? 04:57, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Theresa LaBarbera White
An attempted speedy delete and subsequent prod were both contested, so here it is at Afd. Original speedy based on non-notability: ZERO Ghits unrelated to wikipedia. Eusebeus 08:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - I nominated previously for the prod. No references. No WP:GT. Non-notable. Megapixie 08:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, bad faith nomination. Eusebeus is systematically bringing disputed prods to AfD without regard to merits of dispute. Monicasdude 13:58, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Invalid speedy keep, firstly "bad faith" is not a valid reason to speedy keep, secondly there is already a vote to delete. Stifle (talk) 01:14, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Just because her clients are notable, doesn't mean she is. Jamoche 02:21, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep if verifiable, otherwise delete Destiny's Child and Jessica Simpson are both very notable people and if this person is actually responsible for bringing them forward then this person should be notable enough. Of course, my opinion is that some people are a little "elitist" when trying to get "nn" articles off wikipedia. Nevertheless, if nothing can be verified then the article should be deleted. DanielZimmerman 17:59, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.