Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theresa Longo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Theresa Longo
Article should definitely stay she is working alongside major Hollywood actors and actresses.

Article should stay. Relevence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darlene Jenkins (talk • contribs) 03:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO; little depth of coverage except for a few articles in a local paper the Peterborough Examiner, and an interview by a local website here. Fails WP:ANYBIO; appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record. Fails WP:ENT. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ^^ This is actually wrong and the subject has been covered by international news sources. As you can see she has worked with several well known members of wikipedia and therefore is hugely relevant to entertainment. This article should stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roy Platter (talk • contribs) 18:44, 25 March 2016‎ (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  15:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. There must not be much happening in Peterborough, or the Examiner has a fixation on her, but that apparently isn't shared by the rest of the media. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as all of this is still questionable for WP:ENTERTAINER noting else convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  00:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - lacks significant coverage across multiple reliable sources. Ajraddatz (talk) 02:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.