Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theresa M. Kelly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 16:03, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Theresa M. Kelly

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Subject fails to meet relevant notability guideline (unnotable), the only sources provided are her own website and her self-published book at Lulu.com (i.e. a complete absence of reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy), thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify the information provided in the article have failed. Shannon Rose Talk 16:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions.  — Shannon Rose Talk 16:56, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions.  — Shannon Rose Talk 17:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.  — Shannon Rose Talk 17:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  — Shannon Rose Talk 17:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  — Shannon Rose Talk 17:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — Shannon Rose Talk 17:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — Shannon Rose Talk 17:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  — Shannon Rose Talk 17:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. Not notable, no reliable sources, only self-published sources. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:16, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:BIO, I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources. Robofish (talk) 01:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 07:58, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nomination. Can't establish notability with reliable sources. C6541 (T↔C) 17:53, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.