Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thermal Power Plant 27


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:SKCRIT - no argument for deletion or redirection. (non-admin closure) Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 19:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Thermal Power Plant 27

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Just a generic power plant, not notable for any events. Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom (talk) 21:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. In-depth references from reliable sources about power plants almost always exist, but may require some digging. Take a look at this Google News search for the power plant's Russian name. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I've read it (I do understand Russian language perfectly), including Googling further, and I don't think that very trivial mentions (in sources with questionalble reliability) about very minor accident (like a transformator fire) or stuff like "in 2007–2015 on six stations (ТЭЦ-12, ТЭЦ-16, ТЭЦ-20, ТЭЦ-21, ТЭЦ-26 и ТЭЦ-27) the seven new block-units were introduced" still make this station "notable"... And every secondary source which provides brief historical data about this station basically copies info from primary self-published source, which is this one, which also has highly questionable claims (for example claims about efficiency). But that's just my opinion after researching this for some time... Also, I don't know why this reference was just added today, but it has absolitely NOTHING to do with the station near Moscow since it only talks about different station near certain city in Crimea. Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom (talk) 01:15, 22 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Thank you Eastmain for providing the Russian name. That enabled me to search for scholarly papers.  Three immediately came up with the subject name in the title;
 * МОЛЧАНОВ К.А., СТРАШНЫХ В.П., ЖЕЖЕРЯ Д.А., МАНЕВСКАЯ OA (2008), ПОЛНОМАСШТАБНЫЙ ТРЕНАЖЕР ДЛЯ ОБУЧЕНИЯ ОПЕРАТИВНОГО ПЕРСОНАЛА ЭНЕРГОБЛОКА ПГУ-450 ТЭЦ-27 ОАО 'МОСЭНЕРГО'" ("A full-scale simulator for training operational personnel of the PGU-450 power unit of CHPP-27 of Mosenergo"), Heat-Power Engineering, vol. 10, pp. 69-76.
 * КОПСОВ А.Я et al. (1999), "ОПЫТ РАЗРАБОТКИ И ВНЕДРЕНИЯ ПОЛНОМАСШТАБНОЙ АСУ ТП ЭНЕРГОБЛОКА ПГУ-450Т НА ТЭЦ-27 ОАО 'МОСЭНЕРГО'" ("Experience in developing and implementing a full-scale automated process control system for the PGU-450T power unit at CHPP-27 of Mosenergo"), Electrical Stations, vol. 7, pp. 44-49.
 * БАРСКИЙ Л.А., ЗАЙДЕНБЕРГ Л.М., ГЕЛЬФАНД А.М., ГОВОРКО В.П., ТАРАСОВ Д.В (1999), "Автоматизированная система управления цехом химической водоподготовки ТЭЦ-27 Мосэнерго" ("Automated control system for the chemical water treatment shop of Mosenergo TPP-27"), Heat-Power Engineering, vol. 7, pp. 44-49.
 * There are many more results on gscholar that have the installation name somewhere in the text. Some might be passing mentions, but this is clearly notable. SpinningSpark 15:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Added Facebook — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashfordjohn56 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. This in depth coverage by RIA Novosti is enough for WP:GNG. In addition, sources mentioned by make it notable. Beagel (talk) 19:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.