Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thermal interfacial materials


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Thermal interface material. (non-admin closure) Atmoz (talk) 22:58, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Thermal interfacial materials

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article has no references. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) T/S 02:12, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment "no references" is not a reason to bring an article to AfD when plenty exist. It is easily verified with a simple search. Read WP:BEFORE prior to AfD-ing articles please.--NortyNort (Holla) 02:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:34, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 16:31, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep, premature AfD listing, article was less than an hour old when listed. I think this falls under WP:BITE. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 16:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Why this continual relisting of a discussion where no policy-compliant reason for deletion has been presented? Phil Bridger (talk) 19:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to Thermal interface material. Per our naming conventions, singular is used in the article title, so "Thermal interface material" should house the article material.  I'm saying merge instead of redirect as the sentence in Thermal interfacial materials reads better as a lede than the one in Thermal interface material.  If others, disagree, then a redirect is still appropriate.  -- Whpq (talk) 15:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.