Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thermomix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I withdraw this nomination. (non-admin closure) -- Biblio worm  19:50, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Thermomix

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources, almost certainly non-notable, and borderline promotional.  Biblio worm  22:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - WP:BEFORE. News.com.au, Sydney Morning Herald, Yahoo7 Lifestyle, A Current Affair, Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail UK, SmartCompany, Illawara Mercury, Financial Review, The Age, Focus Germany, Choice Magazine 1 and 2, Daily Mail 2 and 3, Consumer New Zealand, Daily Telegraph again, Globe and Mail. A google books search shows literally hundreds of recipe books see here. JTdale   Talk 23:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - these are a huge deal in Australia where they have a bizarre cult following. There's plenty of coverage to go along with it -
 * This from Australia's leading consumer advocacy group.
 * This about the launch of a new version.
 * This about the award they got for the way they launched it.
 * This about the same thing.
 * At the moment, the vast majority of the "news" coverage is focused on that recent "scandal" but there are plenty of reviews and whole independent cookbooks dedicated to cooking with this device alone. Nom is not wrong about the article, though - needs a lot of work.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 23:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 14 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong keep: several sources, notable worldwide. Please see sources on the articles in other languages. Peter17 (talk) 21:27, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment by nominator. I apparently messed this one up pretty badly, so perhaps we should just close this AfD as snow keep? -- Biblio worm  21:38, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.