Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thermopotash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 15:35, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Thermopotash

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Page is an orphan, lacking notability, reads like product placement. Balle010 (talk) 19:30, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Sourcing is skimpy, and the article is a stub that does indeed read like product placement.TH1980 (talk) 01:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment, so no possiblity of having a few words added to Potash? Coolabahapple (talk) 05:33, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 04:56, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - The only sources appear to be press releases and similarly poor sources. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 🖋 12:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I did find but the topic is not defined in the abstract, and the rest of the article is not in English. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  01:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.