Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theron Pummer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete as creator has withdrawn support, so article will not be expanded (changing the one weak keep to a delete). = Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 22:52, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Theron Pummer
nn vanity. BL Lacertae -  kiss the lizard  02:30, 22 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Keep Neutral  pending outcome of ongoing discussion with nominator.I created this article.  This individual has had published work in a philosophical journal; this work was deemed important enough that it was considered at a philosophical symposium at my college.  I was impressed enough with the work to add it to WP.  Will add citations if, after discussing the matter with the nominator, I remain convinced that the article is worthy. After conversations with various, more experienced Wikipedians, I am now persuaded that this article, even if I added the relevant citations, would not meet notability standards.  KrazyCaley 02:40, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - If professors who do not make outstanding contributions to their field are not notable, their undergrads are doubly not-notable. Ruby 02:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per KrazyCaley - if not expanded, Delete. Tokakeke 02:48, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Should be held to the same standard as other professional in the field to warrant inclusion.  Being published in a journal for one article isn't all that impressive. Peyna 03:20, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ruby. There is also no verification or reference to back up the claim that he was published in a "philosophical journal." Crunch 04:10, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I've had two articles published, that doesn't make me notable. So he isn't either. Liamdaly620 08:15, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn student -- Astrokey44 |talk 15:41, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 18:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: nn. —Wknight94 (talk) 21:05, 22 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.