Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/These Brittle Bones


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:52, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

These Brittle Bones

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not notable. No notability asserted. No reliable refs. All refs are catalogue entries or twitter feeds. Highly advertising  Velella  Velella Talk 11:47, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - as the person who added the 'notability' tag to the article, I have to agree that the subject fails to meet WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. It is generally cited to blogs, Twitter and non-reliable, trivial sources. I can't see anything of substance online to change my mind. All the same, he's obviously a talented young guy, so good luck to him for the future! Sionk (talk) 13:21, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete this along with the related Anchor Bleed album article. Neither appears to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSIC.  Gongshow  Talk 05:48, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * "'Do Not Delete"' - this article does use reviews from music websites about the artist. HAVEPLOTH (talk) 07:49, 11 June 2012 (UTC) — HAVEPLOTH (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Velella  Velella Talk 08:41, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:27, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  →TSU tp* 04:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - not entirely sure why this AfD is being repeatedly re-listed. Three editors are arguing for deletion, while the article is clearly cited to user-edited/submitted websites and blogs. Sionk (talk) 14:47, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.