Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thetapiomegaphi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was don't keep! Mailer Diablo sees no reason to have the article kept given the community consensus. You can email me at mailer.diablo@blah blah. - Mailer Diablo 02:47, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Thetapiomegaphi
I'm sure they're plenty benevolent, but they're also unverifiable, not one Google hit. CanadianCaesar 03:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - unverifiable + no evidence the organization has more than 2 members. -Meegs 04:04, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete — "Alledged"? You've got to be kidding. Daniel Case 04:15, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It doesn't get more "alledged" than "The Viscount de la Shropshire". Flapdragon 07:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete- I, Paul Schorfheide, am also a member of thetapiomegaphi, and see no reason for it to be deleted. Our existance is undeniable, and you can email me at paulzeromi@gmail.com if you need any proof. --Paulzeromi 14:33, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Now why would members of a "secret society" want to advertise? Ifnord 15:31, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Well that cinches it. This is unverifiable.  Delete. Uncle G 19:21, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't DeleteI,The Viscount sphere de la Shropshire, shares in this fraternity and deny the deletion. If there are any questions, ask me at viscount_sphere@hotmail.com or my brother paul.you cannot deny us.--The Viscount Sphere De La Shropshire 20:56, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:V and a really bad hoax. RasputinAXP  talk contribs 22:20, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Better luck next time with the joke. Trilemma 22:23, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * ==Don't Delete== Say what you want. You can say it's a joke or a prank and even delete this entry if you wish, but ΘπΩΦ does exist. We've attempted to give proof, but no one actually seems to want any...
 * Above is Thetapiomegaphi's fourth edit. BD2412  T 03:33, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious hoax. --Bachrach44 21:56, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.