Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thewikiartist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete. -- RHaworth 02:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Thewikiartist
This gets 0 google hits, 6 if you space at the words. Seems to be made up or WP:NOR. No verifiability. --Porqin 12:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - A blend of WP:NEO, WP:VAIN, WP:N and WP:OR, hold the WP:V. ~Matticus TC 12:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, for all of the above.Bjones 12:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Promotional OR garbage for a non-notable project. I'd love for this to be speedied somehow, as this is just using Wikipedia to try to further a career. -- Kicking222 12:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete points for trying to find a new use for wiki...but his use has zip to do with encyclopedia. Bustter 14:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for all the reasons sited by Matticus.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 15:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as it violates everything its supposed to violate, and doesn't meet any of the notability guidelines it's supposed to meet. - Thorne N. Melcher 16:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  a cocktail of violations, listed kindly by Matticus American Patriot 1776 18:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I couldn't even understand all of it, but it clearly looks like vanity. J I P  | Talk 19:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails lots of things. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 19:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Matticus. --S-man 23:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as the author I apologise. It certainly wasn't as cynical as has been perceived. I hoped it may help me start a non profit collective of collaborators as part of an education based art project. I was recommended the idea of listing this project on wikipedia itself by a friend who I trusted in technical matters and as such I did not take due care in reading the policies of wikipedia. Again I humbly apologise. I have deleted the content of the article in advance so nobody else sees it. I will endevor to repay wikipedia for my loss of judgement by helping maintain the rules and ideals of wikipedia from now on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshuaDavidson (talk • contribs)
 * Comment For some reason my vote got duplicated when you left your comment. I removed the duplicate. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 01:43, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.