Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thiaoouba Prophecy (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Since this has only been deleted once previously, I don't think the salt shaker is needed quite yet. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Thiaoouba Prophecy
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Previously deleted as Articles_for_deletion/Thiaoouba_Prophecy. Many of the sources cited do not mention book or author. Still no significant and independent coverage found to satisfy notability requirements. LuckyLouie (talk) 21:40, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete:The sources provided either have nothing to do with the book, do not meet WP:RS, or both. No evidence of notability (either WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK) provided.  Qwyrxian (talk) 03:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: no evidence of reliable coverage of this topic, let alone substantial reliable coverage. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 06:19, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * (And support salt per LuckyLouie HrafnTalkStalk(P) 13:29, 24 January 2011 (UTC) )


 * I do understand the Wikipedia's policies and see what you mean. Unfortunately, at this moment, I couldn't find any reliable sources that could make this article notable from Wikipedia's point of view. But the book IS notable. Because if you read it carefully, you will see how important its message is for all of us. And I know it's all true that is written in the book, for I proved it to myself, if you will, on my own experience (learning to see auras; astral travel, telekinesis, telepathy, etc), including the existence of those people who entrusted Michel Desmarquet with writing of the book. I'm just writing it in a hope that those responsible administrators will at least read the book and, if not try to learn what I learned, maybe leave this article online having realized how important it is. For, yes, at this moment the book is not notable by the official sources, which is not a surprise, but hopefully people will start to open up their minds and then this book will become the assistant to our spiritual development. Steve 17:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 20Bond09 (talk • contribs)
 * I've provided a couple of old newspapers as sources that mention the book. Steve 18:58, 22 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 20Bond09 (talk • contribs)
 * Note the article has been rec-created against policy, and creators state sharing "truth" is their goal. Recommend salt after delete. - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. None of the online references show any notability, and most don't even mention the book. No evidence of notability anywhere else that I could find. Even the article's creator states that he/she "couldn't find any reliable sources that could make this article notable from Wikipedia's point of view".  Book appears to be a pile of fringe theories.--Dmol (talk) 21:34, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not the author of the article, I am a contributor. And I hinted at what one could do before labeling the book as a pile of fringe theories. Steve 15:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 20Bond09 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete as per nominator, Qwyrxian. Also support Salt. Edward321 (talk) 14:18, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.