Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thierry Ehrmann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-27 06:50Z 

Thierry Ehrmann

 * — (View AfD)

Non-notable, promotional. Original speedy-delete was contested. See also Abode of Chaos. Tom Harrison Talk 16:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. 3 non-promotional articles currently on Google News, meets notability standard of WP:BIO.  Neil916 (Talk) 17:20, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, the company he runs should be notable for its uniqueness Alf photoman 19:35, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep with a re-write to make it sound less like a bio. SkierRMH 04:19, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * DeleteWanted to reply on the talk page but since whoever claimed to be fostering a debate can't sign ... It still looks like a promotional page; there is no information under Detractors and the Abode of Chaos is covered (poorly) in a separate article.FasterPussycatWooHoo 11:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep not really a notable business man unless sources commenting on the uniqueness of his business plan can be found. The house controversy, on the other hand, looks like it should have enough coverage to pass WP:BIO, even if it will be mostly in French.  Eluchil404 08:33, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed, but the house controversy is covered in a separate article.FasterPussycatWooHoo 14:14, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete sh!te how is one meant to add to this page? i say delete. if possible, delete thierry ehrmann as well. spammer. dingcb 25 December 2006
 * Weak Delete Full of POV problems and needs a lot of expanding. Seems to be a spam article from a known UBE spammer. Pogo 15:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.