Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thilo Savage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete, nn-bio. Madchester 06:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Thilo Savage
Seems to be NN internet site or even nn-bio. 1380 Google hits is too low for a "personal humor website" to be notable. Delete. Kusma (討論) 02:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It is ridiculous to even consider not making Thilo Savage an article... He is more than notable enough to warrant an article on Wikipedia. Gdawg99 04:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn vanity Ruby 03:17, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Alexa ranking of >650,000 -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 03:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. -Rebelguys2 03:57, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above -- Astrokey44 |talk 04:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Slight merge to The Best Page in the Universe. Traffic Rank for ninjapirate.com:  59,316. (not 650,000).   That's notable for being some guy's website.  I thought BPitU used to mention it...  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-25 10:42Z 
 * Delete self-evident vanispamcruftisement. Just how many web links do you need in one article? Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] AfD? 17:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * There are 4 links, 3 of them are to 1 site and the other one is to the fan page that created this entry. Stop whining. -Bored
 * Keep He gets more then a thousand readers for every article he makes within one day. &mdash;the preceding unsigned comment is by 212.75.76.125 (talk &bull; contribs) 11:48, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 20:32, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, he's not "Pretending" to be the ninjapirate. Ninjapirate is a character he plays, just like Maddox is a character George plays, and he has his own Wiki entry. Thilo has recieved an e-mail from Maddox and had one of his articles mentioned on Conan o'Brien. He has two seperate pages and a fan page. There is no reason he shouldn't get his own entry here. This page is informative and took several fans edits and additions. Don't ruin their(our) work. &mdash;the preceding unsigned comment is by A Corpse Without Soul71.99.211.14 (talk &bull; contribs) 02:25, 26 January 2006  (UTC)
 * Delete If this guy really were *the* Ninja Pirate, then maybe he'd deserve his own page. But someone who pretends to be the host of ninjapirate.com?  That's not an article. --M @ r ē ino 23:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Two fan forums, just like Maddox. Mentioned on Conan. Stand-up comedian. And he's Thilo. THILO. &mdash;the preceding unsigned comment is by Sunni Jeskablo (talk &bull; contribs) 07:31, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, Keep it because reasons to delete it are "unreasonable." An article about a famous "webhost" online should be left alone. Bored @ http://users.boardnation.com/~thilos/index.php?board=3;action=display;threadid=107 &mdash;the preceding unsigned comment is by 68.192.176.71 (talk &bull; contribs) 02:05, 26 January 2006  (UTC)
 * Keep Thilo has a pretty huge cult following. It's worth keeping it. And it's just one article. I mean, c'mon...(Sunni J) &mdash;the preceding unsigned comment is by Sunni Jeskablo (talk &bull; contribs) 07:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Why do you vote twice? Kusma (討論) 13:32, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable website. Influenced by sockpuppets and double-voting. Stifle 14:52, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: It has been copy-pasted to their web forum, with the message that they will copy it back if it is deleted. Based on that, I request the closing admin to deletedpage it if the outcome is a delete. Furthermore I have sent the website a GFDL compliance notice. Stifle 14:54, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: The above comment is ridiculous, the users at the forum spent so long to make this it seems inane for the admins to delete it and have it lost forever. Keep personal opinions to yourself, and don't try to influence the rest of the voters here.  Based on that, I request that the above user be banned from wikipedia for contributing nothing than a biased ACCUSATION based off the OPINIONS of users on a fanboard.  Bored — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.192.176.71 (talk • contribs) 18:42, January 26, 2006
 * If you want to keep your hard work intact, post it on your own website, not on this encyclopedia. Also, if anyone has a personal stake in this, it's you. The rest of the Wikipedia editors here only have a stake in keeping Wikipedia a high-quality, relevant source of knowledge that the populace of editors (not a tiny cult fanbase in a web forum) deem notable. Stifle's comment was completely in line and recommends necessary measures given the reaction this has received. It's obvious you and your friends are not at all familiar with how this website works. &mdash; simpatico hi 19:10, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep site has worldwide recognition and a wide array of fans from different sides of the planet. It would be a dissapointment to let them down by deleting a simple article about a popular website comedian.[Comment by Roman] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.245.178.131 (talk • contribs) 19:30, January 26, 2006
 * Delete per nom. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 00:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Why do you vote twice?-Bored — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.192.176.71 (talk • contribs) 20:01, January 26, 2006
 * Delete. nn. --GeLuxe 02:34, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.