Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Things That Make You Go MMM!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to My Chemical Romance. No info needs merging, since this article has no reliable sources, and a short blurb about this DVD is already included in My Chemical Romance EdJohnston (talk) 15:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Things That Make You Go MMM!

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Ad. I&#39;m with Coco (talk) 16:16, 21 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:34, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge stub to My Chemical Romance where this particular use of that phrase has context in connection with that group.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Strong Delete According to user comments on cduniverse.com, it is unauthorized, contains none of the band's music, and has no interviews with the band members. So why is it on here? Any fan media unauthorized by a band does not get an article here. Nobody would likely type in this term for MCR-related items.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge with My Chemical Romance. I don't see why it's unreasonable for people to be searching this term.  Jujutacular  T · C 03:53, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * For one thing, the C+C Music Factory song "Things That Make You Go Hmmm..." is more searched for than this term (and if anything this should be a redirect there, but the all-caps "MMM" and exclamation mark would never be used in a search). The second thing is that this only gets 161 G-hits altogether (all for this, nothing that the band made themselves) and that again, this is a DVD not at all promoted by the band and judging from customer reviews, was only put out into the marketplace to make a buck for somebody else and was clearly made to confuse fans into thinking this was sold by the band. FInally, the article has only one article linked to it, the MCR article, making it pretty much an orphan in all but templating. We should not be creating articles for promotional items not promoted or sold by the band themselves, or that the fanbase has rejected. Also, that this has gotten under the radar for four years is no excuse either. It should have been speedied G11'ed quite a long time ago.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It seems like we agree that this dvd has no independent notability. So I don't see what the problem with merging pertinent material and redirecting it to My Chemical Romance is.  Jujutacular  T · C 16:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge with article about band. Film appears not to have notability on its own. Jim Heaphy (talk) 05:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject has no notability on its own, and would be nothing more than trivia if merged into the bands article.  Click23 (talk) 13:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.