Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Think Again Conclave, BITS Pilani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete

This page is nearly identical to Think Again Conclave which has a history of deletion and then re-creation without cause. Here is the history of the deletion of the first article:


 * 22:32, May 24, 2015 User:DGG deleted page Think Again Conclave (G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion)
 * 07:42, May 21, 2015 User:Nick deleted page Think Again Conclave (G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion: Articles for deletion/Think Again Conclave)
 * 19:34, March 4, 2015 User:Coffee deleted page Think Again Conclave (Articles for deletion/Think Again Conclave)

The original page has been locked so only administrators can create it. The latest protection log entry is provided below for reference.


 * 22:35, May 24, 2015 User:DGG protected Think Again Conclave (indefinite) (Repeatedly recreated)

I see no reason to wait for this AFD to continue, the decision has already been made by three other admins. Delete and Salt.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:33, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Think Again Conclave, BITS Pilani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recreated version of Articles_for_deletion/Think_Again_Conclave with minimal changes. Soni (talk) 23:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. shoy (reactions) 14:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to BITS Pilani: Not enough coverage to justify a standalone piece. Anup   [Talk]  22:51, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:31, 26 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 00:52, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.