Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thinkman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Rupert Hine. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:23, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Thinkman

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable, unsourced band article; band did not win awards or make other lasting impact.  MBisanz  talk 07:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 00:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep As PROD decliner. Passes WP:BAND #6 at first blush. Will see about sourcing it tomorrow. Jclemens (talk) 07:14, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Strong merge to Rupert Hine. No reason to lose the background on his band. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge sourced and verifiable content to Rupert Hine. Band not independently notable. TheJazzDalek (talk) 13:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge anything sourced as above, but consider this a delete vote if for any reason the merge doesn't happen. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:50, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.