Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thinstalled


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedily deleted as spamineologism --Steve (Stephen)talk 09:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Thinstalled

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a jargon guide, per WP:NOT. Edit: article has been deleted before from uncontested Prod. Razor ICE  09:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, this isn't even jargon -- a neologism introduced by startup company. --Pjacobi 09:15, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable neologism, nothing more. --Edwin Herdman 09:37, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like another case of nnn (non-notable neologism). Charlie 09:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, per nom's update, looks like a recreation. See deletion log here.  Speedy as repost, so tagged. Charlie 09:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Durp! Sorry, misread the CSD.  Prod delete then repost is NOT a justification for a speedy delete.  Have removed speedy tag. Charlie 10:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Spam; it's a verbalization of the name of a product, and the product fails notability. --Alvestrand 10:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not only obnoxious neolospam, but even if it was legitimate, why would it be namespaced in the perfect tense? so many irritating things about this. tomasz.  10:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wiktionary. Looks like it would fit well there. Jazznutuva 13:21, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as spam. Spam does not fit well anywhere in the project. DarkAudit 13:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and no transwiki WP:CSD. --Whstchy 15:29, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Canned processed pork product wrapped up in an attempted neologism. -- Finngall  talk  15:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete and salt, this is blatantly to promote Thinstall as a product. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 23:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.