Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Kishida Cabinet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Mike Rohsopht (talk) 11:59, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Third Kishida Cabinet

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It is not the "Third Kishida Cabinet" but a reshuffled Second Kishida Cabinet. Usually a reshuffled Japanese cabinet do not have a separate article in the English Wikipedia. Mike Rohsopht (talk) 07:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Mike Rohsopht (talk) 07:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Why does English Wiki seek to follow Japanese Wiki on renaming the cabinet as "reshuffled" but not giving it a separate article? Either merge or move the article to be aligned, but why 1 step and not 2? - Indefensible (talk) 17:18, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The naming convention is from the Japanese government. It is called "第2次岸田改造内閣" not "第3次岸田内閣". I will not oppose if someone want to create a separate article in the English Wikipedia for each reshuffled cabinet.--Mike Rohsopht (talk) 05:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Think we should move this article. If no one else wants to separate out the earlier cabinet reshuffles (i.e. similar to Japanese Wiki), then I can work on those as well. - Indefensible (talk) 23:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Not sure. It is a reshuffling, but a very big one, more new faces in this cabinet than those remaining. Maybe it should be merged to the 102nd one, more of a merge discussion than deletion. Fulmard (talk) 20:11, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: I see discussion and proposals for solutions that are outside the regular outcomes for articles in AFD discussions (Keep, Delete, Redirect, Merge). Should this discussion be settled as No Consensus and then you could seek an alternative remedy like a RM? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Does anyone oppose just moving this to Second Kishida Cabinet (Reshuffled) to match the Japanese Wiki? Mike Rohsopht seems correct this should not be called the "Third" cabinet, so it should just be fixed soon. If no one else wants to, I can separate out the previous reshuffled cabinets too. - Indefensible (talk) 17:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I am neutral on this one. Like Indefensible suggested above, if we are to keep this article, the title should be changed to "Second Kishida Cabinet (reshuffled)", at least not "third". -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 04:56, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You can move the article.--Mike Rohsopht (talk) 11:59, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.