Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Korean War


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. WP:SNOW, fails several criteria. Better a speedy close. Tone 17:52, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Third Korean War

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

War is not certain, good candidate for speedy delete as unsourced future conflict A More Perfect Onion (talk) 15:23, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Crystal-ball comment - I have no issue with creating an appropriate article such as Korea, DR, v Korea, Rep, war (2009), if war does come to pass. Should that happen, the new article would not lack for sources. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 15:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Opinion, no proof, no sources. Delete. Intelligentsium (talk) 15:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. TN X Man  15:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete unsourced crystal balling. This would end up in Wikinews first.   Baccyak4H (Yak!) 15:37, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.--Caspian blue 16:07, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wow. I don't think "Crystal ball" even applies here. Closer to hoax. If we started a new "Korean War" article everytime the North or South talked tough, we'd be well into the hundreds by now... Dekkappai (talk) 16:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment It is my understanding that the "old" Korean War-- the one from the '50s-- was never formally ended. So even should hostilities break out again, it would be a continuation, not a "Third Korean War". So here is an article on a future event that likely will not happen, with a fabricated and incorrect name. Speedy Delete. Dekkappai (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I thought the article is about some novel or comics based on an imaginary plot.--Caspian blue 17:19, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Right-- it reads like imaginary literature. "It happened after..." as if it's already occurred... Let's hope no news organization picks up this story before it's deleted! Dekkappai (talk) 17:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.