Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third Rome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, noting that RussianMuslims and Lmoravidmo are socks of an old master .  Materialscientist (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Third Rome

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable enough to be included in an encyclopedia. RussianMuslims (talk) 02:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC) a clearly Russian religious propaganda aimed at war mobilization against the ottoman.--RussianMuslims (talk) 02:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose silly nom by trollish editor. I think setting this up is his only unreverted edit. Johnbod (talk) 02:47, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly notable topic, multiple reliable, independent sources. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 02:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * snowball Keep - nomination without merits acceptable in wikipedia. - üser:Altenmann >t 03:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. A fringe idea which has failed to gain any support among scholars. There may be just a case for including a brief passing mention of the theory in some article such as Constantinople or Istanbul, but there is no basis for a free-standing article on the subject. --Lmoravidmo (talk) 04:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note New account. - üser:Altenmann >t 05:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - established notable topic with lots of sources. Content disputes over alleged errors should be handled on the article's talkpage, and based on reliable sources. GermanJoe (talk) 05:12, 28 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.