Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Third briefs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD general criteria #1 (patent nonsense). Wikipedia is not a place to promote schoolboy nonsense, please see WP:NFT. Gwernol 21:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Third briefs
i dont think it's a hoaxbut it may be a joke Kowlse 20:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete it please. Sparsefarce 20:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia isn't for things you and your friends invented while bored at school one day (why can't I find that on the page?) -- Hawaiian717 20:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Found it at WP:NFT ;) -- Hawaiian717 20:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I have worked in UK schools for thirty plus years and never heard of the game.  Pretty stupid rules anyway - surely it would be simpler to lift the skirt, not pull it down.  There is a Range secondary school in Formby, but whether there is a uniform that includes school skirts I don't know, and I wouldn't have thought that Merseyside schoolboys would dress in a skirt for just a Mars bar!  Anyway, clearly a hoax, maybe based in wishful thinking on the part of a peurile contributor, but plainly for deletion.  Emeraude 20:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep notable game. Dertdad 20:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC) — Dertdad (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete for obvious reasons above. Puerile is the appropriate word. Fan-1967 21:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly not in the scope of a true game or any thing. TheRanger 22:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NFT zephyr2k  22:36, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This article is not a hoax, it's real, and for the benefit of everyone here on Wikipedia. Lighten up, people, this article shows the funny side of society. It's not a hoax, very genuine. Really. Deserves to be a WP:GA. Coxingle 23:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC) — Coxingle (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete Whether or not it's a hoax, it's not at all notable. And as other editors have pointed out, Wikipedia is not a place to post ideas you came up with one random day. NeoChaosX [ talk | contribs ] 23:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete following Coxingle's reasoning. WP:NFT by 10 year olds. Bwithh 00:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete this is so far from a WP:GA it's ridiculous. Lighten up, kids, it's just a stupid game, you can keep playing it in the privacy of your own bars and we can keep the garbage off. Danny Lilithborne 01:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not for things made up in Formby one day. Punkmorten 09:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no this isn't another socky edit.. Wiki not for things made up in school one day, nothing on google about it. If it doesn't exist on google then it obviously isn't notable enough or verifiable. Also delete this sock mountain.-- Andeh 16:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Third briefs is notable - Leslie Bibb has made it so. Oasis9 15:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Oasis9 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Keep, notable game, verified, I can confirm it exists. --12Fires 15:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: 12Fires (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Delete With Fan-1967. Also not verified and google search finds no non-wikipedia references.  Can't this be speedied or snowballed?  Per WP:NFT and the fact that all keep !votes are first edits from what look like single purpose accounts. --Siobhan Hansa 16:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Verifiable, even though no web references. You should play it! WP:GA Ploydoer 16:23, 5 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Ploydoer (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Keep Extremely notable game; well-known in schools across the UK. -QanderVerrs 16:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: QanderVerrs (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Keep I've heard of this; it's a game that's widely played in the UK, almost as known as the exicornt is. --EddieSegoura 16:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Plyceblack (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.  (requested keep in another deleted hoax afd)  Please discount this comment by self-styled impersonator of a banned user. &mdash;Bunchofgrapes  (talk) 16:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Extremely notable game, mentioned on 96.6 TFM and Q103 fairly recently. --Blangibillock 16:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: Blangibillock (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Keep. Notable, Bill Clinton and Tony Blair played this in the gardens of Downing Street a year ago. --XFowl4 16:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: XFowl4 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Keep per nom above, and the above incident is verifiable. --DaceMaker 16:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: DaceMaker (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Keep, one of the best articles on Wikipedia, WP:V is met, not WP:CSD material, notable game, take this to Requests for arbitration if you've got a problem with it. --Zephram Stark (I&#39;m Back!!) 16:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC) — Possible single purpose account: TheSumOfYourLightFromYorkshire (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
 * Delete with all possible speed per WP:NFT. --TeaDrinker 19:46, 5 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.