Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thirdmoon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:36, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Thirdmoon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No assertion of notability and no secondary coverage or links. ReformedArsenal (talk) 02:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:30, 3 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. It appears they released two albums on Napalm Records and one on FM Records, meeting WP:MUSICBIO. This is unverified though - some independent coverage would strengthen the claim for inclusion. Thanks. — sparklism  hey! 09:00, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 09:29, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Weak keep. They definitely released two albums on Napalm Records - this is easily verifiable - but I couldn't find much coverage of the band online other than this. --Michig (talk) 19:15, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:19, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Go   Phightins  !  19:13, 24 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep notable enough. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 20:34, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.