Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thirteen (Harem Scarem album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Harem Scarem. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Thirteen (Harem Scarem album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication that the album is notable yet - not released yet, not reviewed, no significant pre-release buzz beyond the band's own announcements. Huon (talk) 21:09, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Huon is incorrect, plenty of posts on google to support a page as well as the history of the band. No reason at all to delete this page.(talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:26, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Harem_Scarem. The problem here is that WP:GHITS doesn't actually mean anything when it comes to something's notability. Something could come up with thousands of hits in a search, yet if none of those are considered to be reliable sources per Wikipedia's guidelines then they cannot show notability regardless of the number brought up. Heck, I've seen instances where something has come up with millions of search results, but almost none of them were usable as RS that could show notability. In contrast, I've seen instances where a topic had less than a handful of result pages, yet they had enough coverage to merit a keep. As far as Thirteen goes, there just isn't any coverage out there. So far the coverage has all been WP:PRIMARY or in places that would be seen as otherwise unusable as a reliable source. Nobody is doubting that the album has been announced or that the band has every intention of releasing this once it's all done, but right now it is just WP:TOOSOON for an entry. The only reasonably useful source I found was this link. Perhaps this will change once the campaign is over, but until we have that coverage there's really nothing we can do about it unless one of us happens to have an "in" with several news corporations and can get them to run stories on the album. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Harem Scarem where it is already mentioned. Until the album is at least recorded it doesn't merit an article and shouldn't be included in a discography until it's certain that it's going to be released. --Michig (talk) 06:19, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.