Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thirteen Women Strong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:09, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Thirteen Women Strong

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable book per WP:NBOOK. Article reads like a poor review/book report. KidAd (talk) 02:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:58, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:58, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:58, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:58, 22 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - I did a quick google search but found zero coverage regarding the book and it does not appear to have won any major awards. Additionally it is written very poorly almost like a book report as KidAd stated and would most definitely require a major rewrite if it is kept. Edi 7*  (Message Me! • &#128220; ) 09:48, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. A search on newpapers.com for the book title turned up 4 passing mentions, including one article about its author, who does appear to be notable. But nothing in Publishers Weekly, nothing in NYT, only this press release from the publisher, which is not an independent source. I'm amazed this article has lasted for more than a decade. Cheers! — Grand&#39;mere Eugene (talk) 17:23, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - Why is this listed as a school related subject? It's about the author's experience in college, not high school. Even if it was, it would still be out of scope. John from Idegon (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.