Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thirukumaran Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. This debate has been relisted twice and we're no nearer having a firm consensus either way, as such a no consensus close is the only sensible option. This is of course without prejudice to the article being renominated in the future.  Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 22:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Thirukumaran Entertainment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail our WP:GNG for WP:ORGS. SarahStierch (talk) 06:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 07:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 07:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - new successful Tamil film producer mentioned in reliable sources: The Hindu, Behindwoods, IndiaGlitz, Times of India, etc. --  Dravidian   Hero  09:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 5 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Theopolisme ( talk )  04:08, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 June 11.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  09:39, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the company participated in multiple notable productions, which is confirmed by multiple reliable sources. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 10:29, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of in-depth independent coverage as required by the WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  03:51, 19 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.