Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thiruvennainallur block


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:41, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Thiruvennainallur block

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No content, extremely short stub, and potentially trivial. MxYamato (talk) 10:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and India.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:58, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Category:Revenue blocks of Tamil Nadu has 379 articles, out of 1,349 Revenue blocks the state apparently has. They're pretty much all in this poor of a condition without explanation of why they're a notable subdivision in addition to the districts (taluks) when they're only used for tax-related administration. Reywas92Talk 14:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep revenue blocks seem to be administrative units in some way which probably satisfies GEOLAND.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 07:11, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * delete From what I see in the revenue block article, these are purely administrative divisions about which almost nothing can be said beyond which state they're in and which villages they contain. My impression is that they fail WP:GNG in that there's no real way to make a claim of notability about any of them. Mangoe (talk) 20:02, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per Reywas92. - SUN EYE 1  16:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.