Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Is Fake DIY (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus to delete. J- ſtan ContribsUser page 03:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

This Is Fake DIY
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously deleted material. (Articles for deletion/This Is Fake DIY) Non notable website, Google search turns up most results are a song by the same name. First noticed article when mass linked to music reviews by several accounts. William Graham talk 18:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 
 * Speedy Delete. Per WP:CSD and tagged as such, recreation of deleted material. >< Richard  Ω6  12  20:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't think it really qualifies for G4 anymore as this is a much more expanded version of the article from what I can gather from the last afd. It now has a claim to notability due to winning an award. Last time it appears it was just adspam. Not to mention that that afd was 2 years ago. A deletion by afd isn't a forever thing if the article can later be shown to be about something notable. -Djsasso (talk) 20:35, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The webzine continues to fall short of WP:WEB, from what I can see, but the label is starting to attract just enough attention to pass WP:CORP or whatever the standard is. --Dhartung | Talk 20:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral. Google News hits are trivial mentions, and although it's been nominated for an award this is in desperate need of another quality citation if it's to stay, preferably more than one other third-party source.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 03:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:46, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.